The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of resection margin on outcome in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities treated with limb-sparing surgery and postoperative radiotherapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12957-024-03380-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chun-Chieh Chen, Yao-Yu Wu, Jo-Ting Kao, Chih‑Hsiang Chang, Shih-Chiang Huang, Hsin‑Nung Shih |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,966,043
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#136
of 2,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,024
of 198,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them