The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Landscape fragmentation overturns classical metapopulation thinking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2303846121 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yun Tao, Alan Hastings, Kevin D. Lafferty, Ilkka Hanski, Otso Ovaskainen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 29% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 7 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 10% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,987,354
of 26,436,676 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#24,485
of 104,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,357
of 333,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#320
of 843 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,436,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 843 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.