Interdisziplinäres, kollaboratives D-A-CH Konsensus-Statement zur Diagnostik und Behandlung von Myalgischer Enzephalomyelitis/Chronischem Fatigue-Syndrom
Kathryn Hoffmann, Astrid Hainzl, Michael Stingl, Katharina Kurz, Beate Biesenbach, Christoph Bammer, Uta Behrends, Wolfgang Broxtermann, Florian Buchmayer, Anna Maria Cavini, Gregory Sacha Fretz, Markus Gole, Bettina Grande, Tilman Grande, Lotte Habermann-Horstmeier, Verena Hackl, Jürg Hamacher, Joachim Hermisson, Martina King, Sonja Kohl, Sandra Leiss, Daniela Litzlbauer, Herbert Renz-Polster, Wolfgang Ries, Jonas Sagelsdorff, Carmen Scheibenbogen, Bernhard Schieffer, Lena Schön, Claudia Schreiner, Kevin Thonhofer, Maja Strasser, Thomas Weber, Eva Untersmayr
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 457. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2024.
All research outputs
#65,125
of 26,811,559 outputs
Outputs from Acta Medica Austriaca
#2
of 1,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#954
of 338,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Medica Austriaca
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,811,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
