↓ Skip to main content

源氏物語の絵と注釈

Overview of attention for article published in Chuukobungaku, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
源氏物語の絵と注釈
Published in
Chuukobungaku, May 2019
DOI 10.32152/chukobungaku.84.0_1
Authors

清水 婦久子, 野口 剛, 高橋 亨, 小嶋 菜温子, 山本 登朗

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,669,971
of 25,901,238 outputs
Outputs from Chuukobungaku
#37
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,719
of 368,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chuukobungaku
#20
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,901,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.