↓ Skip to main content

奴隷の「病」としてのノスタルジー ―バレーラ『考察』(1798年キューバ)を読む―

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Latin American Studies, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
奴隷の「病」としてのノスタルジー ―バレーラ『考察』(1798年キューバ)を読む―
Published in
Annals of Latin American Studies, May 2024
DOI 10.51100/annualofajel.44.0_34
Authors

岩村 健二郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2024.
All research outputs
#6,578,620
of 26,075,497 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Latin American Studies
#1
of 15 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,390
of 219,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Latin American Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,075,497 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 14 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them