↓ Skip to main content

Topology in soft and biological matter

Overview of attention for article published in Physics Reports, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Topology in soft and biological matter
Published in
Physics Reports, July 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.physrep.2024.04.002
Authors

Luca Tubiana, Gareth P. Alexander, Agnese Barbensi, Dorothy Buck, Julyan H.E. Cartwright, Mateusz Chwastyk, Marek Cieplak, Ivan Coluzza, Simon Čopar, David J. Craik, Marco Di Stefano, Ralf Everaers, Patrícia F.N. Faísca, Franco Ferrari, Achille Giacometti, Dimos Goundaroulis, Ellinor Haglund, Ya-Ming Hou, Nevena Ilieva, Sophie E. Jackson, Aleksandre Japaridze, Noam Kaplan, Alexander R. Klotz, Hongbin Li, Christos N. Likos, Emanuele Locatelli, Teresa López-León, Thomas Machon, Cristian Micheletti, Davide Michieletto, Antti Niemi, Wanda Niemyska, Szymon Niewieczerzal, Francesco Nitti, Enzo Orlandini, Samuela Pasquali, Agata P. Perlinska, Rudolf Podgornik, Raffaello Potestio, Nicola M. Pugno, Miha Ravnik, Renzo Ricca, Christian M. Rohwer, Angelo Rosa, Jan Smrek, Anton Souslov, Andrzej Stasiak, Danièle Steer, Joanna Sułkowska, Piotr Sułkowski, De Witt L. Sumners, Carsten Svaneborg, Piotr Szymczak, Thomas Tarenzi, Rui Travasso, Peter Virnau, Dimitris Vlassopoulos, Primož Ziherl, Slobodan Žumer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Professor 3 16%
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 37%
Unspecified 3 16%
Engineering 2 11%
Computer Science 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,947,977
of 26,313,853 outputs
Outputs from Physics Reports
#107
of 1,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,701
of 184,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physics Reports
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,313,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.