↓ Skip to main content

World Health Organization (WHO) guideline on the complementary feeding of infants and young children aged 6−23 months 2023: A multisociety response

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
World Health Organization (WHO) guideline on the complementary feeding of infants and young children aged 6−23 months 2023: A multisociety response
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, May 2024
DOI 10.1002/jpn3.12248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hepatology & Nutrition European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, European Academy of Paediatrics, European Society for Paediatric Research, European Academy for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Hepatology & Nutrition Federation of International Societies for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition Latin American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Pan Arab Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Hepatology and Nutrition Asian Pan‐Pacific Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, World Allergy Organization, Respirology & Immunology Asia Pacific Academy of Pediatric Allergy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Other 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 25%
Unspecified 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,022,259
of 26,202,139 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#96
of 5,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,536
of 302,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,202,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.