You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impacts of artificial rearing on cisco Coregonus artedi morphology, including pugheadedness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Zoology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1139/cjz-2023-0195 |
| Authors |
Andrew E. Honsey, Katie V. Anweiler, David B. Bunnell, Cory O. Brant, Georgia Hoffman, Brian P. O'Malley, Kevin M. Keeler, Chris Olds, Jeremy Kraus, Yu-Chun Kao, Wendylee Stott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,482,840
of 25,990,612 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Zoology
#631
of 2,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,142
of 194,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Zoology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them