You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic polymorphisms in IL‐2, IL‐10 and FOXP3 are associated with autoimmune neutropenia in early childhood and autoantibody specificity in a Danish cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/sji.13374 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kirstine Kløve‐Mogensen, Rudi Steffensen, Tania Nicole Masmas, Andreas Glenthøj, Christina Friis Jensen, Paul Ratcliffe, Petter Höglund, Henrik Hasle, Kaspar René Nielsen, Thure Mors Haunstrup |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 2 | 67% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,775,829
of 25,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Immunology
#421
of 1,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,716
of 157,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Immunology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them