The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Murf1 alters myosin replacement rates in cultured myotubes in a myosin isoform–dependent manner
|
---|---|
Published in |
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11626-024-00916-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emi Uenaka, Koichi Ojima, Takahiro Suzuki, Ken Kobayashi, Susumu Muroya, Takanori Nishimura |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,510,010
of 26,352,576 outputs
Outputs from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
#157
of 870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,167
of 320,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,352,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 870 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.