The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Re-Writing Pandemic Histories: Introduction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the History of Medicine & Allied Sciences, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jhmas/jrae005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacob Steere-Williams, Claire Edington |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Andorra | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,902,026
of 26,499,616 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Medicine & Allied Sciences
#122
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,285
of 324,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Medicine & Allied Sciences
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,499,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.