↓ Skip to main content

New Bibenzyl Cannabinoid from the New Zealand Liverwort Radula marginata

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 5,757)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Bibenzyl Cannabinoid from the New Zealand Liverwort Radula marginata
Published in
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 2002
DOI 10.1248/cpb.50.1390
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masao Toyota, Takuji Shimamura, Hikari Ishii, Matt Renner, John Braggins, Yoshinori Asakawa

Abstract

The ether extract of the New Zealand liverwort Radula marginata afforded a new cannabinoid type bibenzyl compound named perrottetinenic acid, and two new bibenzyls, together with a known cannabinoid, perrottetinene. Their structures were established by two dimensional (2D) NMR spectral data. The structure of perrottetinenic acid was a similar to that of Delta(1)-tetrahydrocannabinol, a known hallucinogen. Cannabinoid type bibenzyls have been isolated from liverwort Radula perrottetii, though have not previously been reported from the liverwort R. marginata.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 20%
Chemistry 11 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,541,230
of 23,477,147 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#6
of 5,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,551
of 124,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#1
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,477,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,757 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.