The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Peggy Piggott and Post-war British Archaeology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Archaeology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1017/eaa.2024.13 |
| Authors |
Rachel Pope, Mairi H. Davies |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 17% |
| Jersey | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,223,408
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Archaeology
#24
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,092
of 327,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Archaeology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.