↓ Skip to main content

江戸における写し霊場の鑑賞構造

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 188)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
江戸における写し霊場の鑑賞構造
Published in
Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, July 2011
DOI 10.5632/jila.58.5_161
Authors

近藤 隆二郎

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,782,083
of 25,980,896 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#31
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,737
of 132,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#7
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,980,896 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.