The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
知るということ On knowing, not-knowing, and doubting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annual Review of the Philosophical Association of Western Japan, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.34326/pawj.16.0_147 |
| Authors |
納富 信留 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 99% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#655,232
of 26,555,952 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of the Philosophical Association of Western Japan
#1
of 7 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,256
of 334,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of the Philosophical Association of Western Japan
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,555,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them