You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Scientific Opinion on additional scientific data related to the safety of preparations of Rheum palmatum L., Rheum officinale Baill. and their hybrids, Rhamnus purshiana DC., Rhamnus frangula L. and Cassia senna L., submitted pursuant to Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006
|
---|---|
Published in |
EFSA Journal, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8766 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Novel Foods and Food Allergens EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Dominique Turck, Torsten Bohn, Jacqueline Castenmiller, Stefaan De Henauw, Karen Ildico Hirsch‐Ernst, Helle Katrine Knutsen, Inge Mangelsdorf, Harry J. McArdle, Androniki Naska, Kristina Pentieva, Alfonso Siani, Frank Thies, Sophia Tsabouri, Marco Vinceti, AnnaMaria Rossi, Ariane Titz, Thibault Fiolet, Alexandre Maciuk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 8 | 24% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 24 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 94% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,709,159
of 26,107,266 outputs
Outputs from EFSA Journal
#375
of 4,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,248
of 208,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EFSA Journal
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,107,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.