The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gluconeogenesis during development of the grass puffer (Takifugu niphobles)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cbpa.2024.111663 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takafumi Kodama, Seiya Watanabe, Isana Kayanuma, Akira Sasaki, Daisuke Kurokawa, Otto Baba, Mitsuru Jimbo, Fumiya Furukawa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,164,342
of 26,154,283 outputs
Outputs from Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology
#42
of 1,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,067
of 282,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,154,283 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them