The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tiny trades, big questions: Fractional shares
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Financial Economics, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103836 |
Authors |
Robert P. Bartlett, Justin McCrary, Maureen O'Hara |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Researcher | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 31% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,805,907
of 26,130,653 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Financial Economics
#284
of 2,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,630
of 88,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Financial Economics
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,130,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them