The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Discoloration of textile dyes by spent mushroom substrate of Agaricus bisporus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bioresource Technology, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130807 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brigit van Brenk, Leodie Kruidhof, Antoine J B Kemperman, Walter G J van der Meer, Han A B Wösten |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 38% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 25% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
Chemistry | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#611,171
of 26,014,510 outputs
Outputs from Bioresource Technology
#18
of 8,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,120
of 228,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioresource Technology
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,014,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,462 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.