You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chemical composition analysis of Qingyan dropping pills using ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography‐quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry
|
---|---|
Published in |
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/rcm.9833 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lexin Shu, Huixin Qiu, Yufan He, Shumin Zhang, Jun Qian, Sitong Liu, Xiaodi Kou, Qiduo Zhao, Yubo Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#14,855,802
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#2,426
of 5,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,416
of 165,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,054 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.