The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic counselling for at-risk family members with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: data from a single-centre study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Amyloid, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1080/13506129.2024.2357094 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katsuya Nakamura, Tsuneaki Yoshinaga, Akiko Sakyu, Akira Matsushima, Yuka Yonehara, Tomomi Kojima, Masumi Ishikawa, Emiko Kise, Tomoki Kosho, Yoshiki Sekijima |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2024.
All research outputs
#824,058
of 26,147,626 outputs
Outputs from Amyloid
#8
of 535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,936
of 222,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amyloid
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,147,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them