↓ Skip to main content

A Great Tsunami Earthquake Component of the 1957 Aleutian Islands Earthquake

Overview of attention for article published in Earth & Planetary Science Letters, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Great Tsunami Earthquake Component of the 1957 Aleutian Islands Earthquake
Published in
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, July 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118691
Authors

Yoshiki Yamazaki, Thorne Lay, Kwok Fai Cheung, Robert C. Witter, SeanPaul M. La Selle, Bruce E. Jaffe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,437,233
of 26,306,521 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#4,778
of 5,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,507
of 180,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#30
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,306,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.