You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Response to Bass et al.’s “Significant discordance in DermTech test results when paired with histopathology: Caveat emptor”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.05.079 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alejandra K Moncayo, Douglas Grossman, Caroline C Kim, Rebecca I Hartman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,725,388
of 26,170,906 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
#1,621
of 11,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,131
of 194,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
#5
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,170,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.