↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary ecology of masting: mechanisms, models, and climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolutionary ecology of masting: mechanisms, models, and climate change
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, June 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2024.05.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michal Bogdziewicz, Dave Kelly, Davide Ascoli, Thomas Caignard, Francesco Chianucci, Elizabeth E Crone, Emilie Fleurot, Jessie J Foest, Georg Gratzer, Tomika Hagiwara, Qingmin Han, Valentin Journé, Léa Keurinck, Katarzyna Kondrat, Ryan McClory, Jalene M LaMontagne, Ignacio A Mundo, Anita Nussbaumer, Iris Oberklammer, Misuzu Ohno, Ian S Pearse, Mario B Pesendorfer, Giulia Resente, Akiko Satake, Mitsue Shibata, Rebecca S Snell, Jakub Szymkowiak, Laura Touzot, Rafal Zwolak, Magdalena Zywiec, Andrew J Hacket-Pain

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Master 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Unspecified 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 28%
Unspecified 3 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,159,633
of 26,604,138 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1,169
of 3,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,940
of 321,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,604,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.