You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tropical forest succession increases tree taxonomic and functional richness but decreases evenness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Ecology & Biogeography, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/geb.13856 |
| Authors |
Masha T. van der Sande, Lourens Poorter, Géraldine Derroire, Mario Marcos do Espirito Santo, Madelon Lohbeck, Sandra C. Müller, Radika Bhaskar, Michiel van Breugel, Juan Manuel Dupuy‐Rada, Sandra M. Durán, Catarina C. Jakovac, Horacio Paz, Danaë M. A. Rozendaal, Pedro Brancalion, Dylan Craven, Francisco Mora Ardilla, Jarcilene S. Almeida, Patricia Balvanera, Justin Becknell, Bryan Finegan, Ricardo Gomes César, José Luis Hernández‐Stefanoni, Deborah Kennard, Susan G. Letcher, Erika Marín‐Spiotta, Rodrigo Muñoz, Casandra Reyes‐García, Lucía Sanaphre‐Villanueva, Luis P. Utrera, Geraldo Wilson Fernandes, Francisco S. Álvarez, Jose Luis Andrade, Felipe Arreola, Vanessa Boukili, George A. L. Cabral, Jerome Chave, Robin Chazdon, Gabriel Colletta, Maria das Dores Magalhães Veloso, Ben de Jong, Edwin Lebrija‐Trejos, Vanessa de Souza Moreno, Daisy H. Dent, Saara DeWalt, Elisa Díaz García, Yule Roberta Ferreira Nunes, Vanessa Granda, Jefferson Hall, Rodney Lobo, Omar Lopez, Miguel Martínez Ramos, Jorge A. Meave, Susana Ochoa‐Gaona, Everardo V. S. B. Sampaio, Arturo Sanchez‐Azofeifa, Heitor Mancini Teixeira, Marisol Toledo, Maria Uriarte, S. Joseph Wright, Kátia Zanini, Frans Bongers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 70% |
| Scientists | 11 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,508,790
of 26,191,377 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#323
of 2,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,903
of 210,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,191,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.