You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Acceptable performance of blood biomarker tests of amyloid pathology — recommendations from the Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer’s Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Reviews Neurology, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41582-024-00977-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Suzanne E. Schindler, Douglas Galasko, Ana C. Pereira, Gil D. Rabinovici, Stephen Salloway, Marc Suárez-Calvet, Ara S. Khachaturian, Michelle M. Mielke, Chi Udeh-Momoh, Joan Weiss, Richard Batrla, Sasha Bozeat, John R. Dwyer, Drew Holzapfel, Daryl Rhys Jones, James F. Murray, Katherine A. Partrick, Emily Scholler, George Vradenburg, Dylan Young, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich, Jiri Aubrecht, Joel B. Braunstein, James Hendrix, Yan Helen Hu, Soeren Mattke, Mark Monane, David Reilly, Elizabeth Somers, Charlotte E. Teunissen, Eli Shobin, Hugo Vanderstichele, Michael W. Weiner, David Wilson, Oskar Hansson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 7% |
Sweden | 2 | 4% |
India | 2 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 57% |
Scientists | 18 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
Other | 1 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 20% |
Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 20% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 269. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#140,363
of 26,188,345 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neurology
#22
of 2,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,072
of 195,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neurology
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,188,345 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.