↓ Skip to main content

New methods for old questions: Predicting historical urban renewal areas in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New methods for old questions: Predicting historical urban renewal areas in the United States
Published in
Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, June 2024
DOI 10.1177/23998083241260778
Authors

Wenfei Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,493,083
of 26,149,954 outputs
Outputs from Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science
#211
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,844
of 163,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,149,954 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.