The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Assessment of Germany’s Remaining CO2 Budget: Can Germany Still Afford to Destroy Villages to Burn More Coal?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1080/00139157.2024.2338049 |
| Authors |
Pao-Yu Oei, Philipp J. Herpich |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 86% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,789,636
of 26,521,103 outputs
Outputs from Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development
#68
of 449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,244
of 311,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,521,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them