You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Wound management materials and technologies from bench to bedside and beyond
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Reviews Materials, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41578-024-00693-y |
Authors |
Canran Wang, Ehsan Shirzaei Sani, Chia-Ding Shih, Chwee Teck Lim, Joseph Wang, David G. Armstrong, Wei Gao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 9 | 53% |
Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
Researcher | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 14% |
Materials Science | 1 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2024.
All research outputs
#336,644
of 26,176,298 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Materials
#20
of 855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,264
of 164,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Materials
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,176,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.