You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Racist Agnotology: How Myth-Making about Institutions and Knowledge Production Contributes to Racialized Ignorance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1177/23326492241259403 |
| Authors |
Kushan Dasgupta, Nicole Iturriaga, Aaron Panofsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 54% |
| Scientists | 10 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,507,496
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
#132
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,500
of 167,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.