You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On‐site analysis and rapid identification of citrus herbs by miniature mass spectrometry and machine learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/rcm.9780 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xingyu Wang, Yanqiao Xie, Jinliang Yu, Ye Chen, Yun Tian, Ziying Wang, Zhengtao Wang, Linnan Li, Li Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2024.
All research outputs
#15,448,608
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#2,604
of 5,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,168
of 163,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#8
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,066 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.