You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rapid identification of reproductive toxicants among environmental chemicals using an in vivo evaluation of gametogenesis in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Toxicology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108630 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ravinder Kumar, Ashwini Oke, Beth Rockmill, Matthew de Cruz, Rafael Verduzco, Anura Shodhan, Xavier Woodruff-Madeira, Dimitri P Abrahamsson, Julia Varshavsky, Juleen Lam, Joshua F Robinson, Patrick Allard, Tracey J Woodruff, Jennifer C Fung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,138,007
of 26,184,895 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Toxicology
#128
of 1,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,307
of 164,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Toxicology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.