↓ Skip to main content

旋尾線虫幼虫type Xの関与が強く示唆されたホタルイカ生食による急性腹症10例の臨床的検討

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 310)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
旋尾線虫幼虫type Xの関与が強く示唆されたホタルイカ生食による急性腹症10例の臨床的検討
Published in
Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology, February 2008
DOI 10.11405/nisshoshi1964.93.312
Authors

青山 庄, 樋上 義伸, 高橋 洋一, 吉光 裕, 草島 義徳, 広野 禎介, 高柳 尹立, 赤尾 信明, 近藤 力王至

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,861,518
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology
#30
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,482
of 96,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.