You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Systematic REVIEW of Autopsy findings in deaths after covid-19 vaccination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Forensic Science International, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112115 |
| Authors |
Nicolas Hulscher, Paul E. Alexander, Richard Amerling, Heather Gessling, Roger Hodkinson, William Makis, Harvey A. Risch, Mark Trozzi, Peter A. McCullough |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7,089 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7089 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6928 | 98% |
| Scientists | 72 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 64 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 25 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3912. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,325
of 26,210,036 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science International
#1
of 4,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8
of 244,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science International
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,210,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.