↓ Skip to main content

How Should Regulatory Schemes Be Optimized to Enhance Deterrence against Medical Insurance Fraud by Enrollees? Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in China

Overview of attention for article published in Social Science & Medicine, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Should Regulatory Schemes Be Optimized to Enhance Deterrence against Medical Insurance Fraud by Enrollees? Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in China
Published in
Social Science & Medicine, June 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117059
Authors

Jinsui Zhang, Min Hu, Yusheng Jia, Yuanyuan Gu, Wen Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,573,047
of 26,196,613 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#5,198
of 12,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,280
of 236,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#19
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,196,613 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.