↓ Skip to main content

Re-evaluating the origins of sands in the Gurbantunggut Desert and its role as an aeolian dust contributor

Overview of attention for article published in Global & Planetary Change, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Re-evaluating the origins of sands in the Gurbantunggut Desert and its role as an aeolian dust contributor
Published in
Global & Planetary Change, August 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2024.104482
Authors

Yue Li, Yougui Song, Yu’an Guo, Peng Liang, Xiuling Chen, Jingyun Xiao, Shukhrat Shukurov, Yudong Li

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,812,327
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Global & Planetary Change
#210
of 1,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,240
of 21,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global & Planetary Change
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them