You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The ‘LSVEC problem’ for the Vienna Peedee belemnite carbon isotope‐delta scale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/rcm.9841 |
| Authors |
Philip J. H. Dunn, Federica Camin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,817,453
of 26,215,468 outputs
Outputs from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#1,202
of 5,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,805
of 165,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,075 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.