You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Unified 200 kyr paleohydrologic history of the Southern Great Basin: Death Valley, Searles Valley, Owens Valley and the Devils Hole cave
|
---|---|
Published in |
Quaternary Science Reviews, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108751 |
Authors |
Tim K. Lowenstein, Kristian J. Olson, Brian W. Stewart, David McGee, Justin S. Stroup, Adam M. Hudson, Kathleen A. Wendt, Mark D. Peaple, Sarah J. Feakins, Tripti Bhattacharya, Steve Lund |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 80% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#14,921,700
of 26,206,339 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#2,755
of 4,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,861
of 137,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#26
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,206,339 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.