The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Ceramic With a Needle-Shaped Surface Topography Versus Autograft in Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Spine, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1097/brs.0000000000005075 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hilde W. Stempels, A. Mechteld Lehr, Diyar Delawi, Eric A. Hoebink, Inge A.A.A. Wiljouw, Diederik H.R. Kempen, Job L.C. van Susante, Moyo C. Kruyt, on behalf of the Dutch Clinical Spine Research Group |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2024.
All research outputs
#181,259
of 26,437,155 outputs
Outputs from Spine
#30
of 8,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,159
of 301,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,437,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.