The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Naturalizing relevance realization: why agency and cognition are fundamentally not computational
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1362658 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes Jaeger, Anna Riedl, Alex Djedovic, John Vervaeke, Denis Walsh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 106 | 75% |
| Scientists | 26 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 2 | 17% |
| Psychology | 2 | 17% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#503,546
of 26,571,961 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,067
of 35,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,911
of 311,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#4
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.