You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical Complexities in Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Surrogate Decision Making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The American Journal of Bioethics, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1080/15265161.2024.2362553 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Faith E. Fletcher, Lauren Taylor, Ryan H. Nelson, Bryanna Moore, Brendan Saloner, Peter A. Ubel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,169,301
of 26,210,734 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Bioethics
#882
of 2,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,159
of 163,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Bioethics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,210,734 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them