↓ Skip to main content

Examining the relationship between public stigma, models of addiction, and addictive disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction Research & Theory, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examining the relationship between public stigma, models of addiction, and addictive disorders
Published in
Addiction Research & Theory, June 2024
DOI 10.1080/16066359.2024.2365156
Authors

Samantha M. Rundle, Abby L. Goldstein, Jeffrey D. Wardell, John A. Cunningham, Jürgen Rehm, Christian S. Hendershot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,514,108
of 26,194,269 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Research & Theory
#330
of 796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,300
of 166,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Research & Theory
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,194,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.