↓ Skip to main content

Land of the giants: Body mass estimates of Palaeoloxodon from the Pleistocene of Taiwan

Overview of attention for article published in Quaternary Science Reviews, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Land of the giants: Body mass estimates of Palaeoloxodon from the Pleistocene of Taiwan
Published in
Quaternary Science Reviews, July 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.108761
Authors

Deep Shubhra Biswas, Chun-Hsiang Chang, Cheng-Hsiu Tsai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,776,988
of 26,214,973 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#839
of 4,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,347
of 141,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#10
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,214,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.