The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
BSACI guidance for the implementation of Palforzia® peanut oral immunotherapy in the United Kingdom: A Delphi consensus study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical & Experimental Allergy, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1111/cea.14491 |
Authors |
Tom Marrs, Nandinee Patel, Sarah Burrell, Anjali Rampersad, Eleanor Minshall, Susan Leech, Dinusha Chandratilleke, Justine Dempsey, Sian Ludman, Graham Roberts, Louise Jane Michaelis, Helen A. Brough, Surendra Karanam, Rebecca Batt, Phoebe Moulsdale, Gary Steifel, Kiran Tiwana, Helen Smith, Katherine Knight, Marta Vazquez‐Ortiz, Deepan Vyas, Paul J. Turner, Nick Makwana |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2024.
All research outputs
#882,791
of 26,406,115 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#88
of 3,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,077
of 263,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,406,115 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.