The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality
|
---|---|
Published in |
Accountability in Research, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1080/08989621.2024.2366281 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alyssa Shi, Brooke Bier, Carrigan Price, Luke Schwartz, Devan Wainright, Audra Whithaus, Alison Abritis, Ivan Oransky, Misha Angrist |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 25% |
Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,329,956
of 26,450,612 outputs
Outputs from Accountability in Research
#48
of 471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,249
of 292,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Accountability in Research
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,450,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.