The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The need for guidance in antidepressant drug development: Revisiting the role of the forced swim test and tail suspension test
|
---|---|
Published in |
Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105666 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emily R Trunnell, Julia Baines, Stephen Farghali, Tara Jackson, Kimberley Jayne, Rachel Smith, Tina Stibbe |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 85% |
Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#2,194,809
of 26,571,961 outputs
Outputs from Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP
#172
of 2,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,512
of 310,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology: RTP
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them