You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Utilization of abandoned land as cattle grazing restores butterfly and flowering plant diversities in Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Research, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1440-1703.12494 |
| Authors |
Naoyuki Nakahama, Tomo Hamano, Mari Fujimoto, Akifumi Eto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 142 | 95% |
| Scientists | 6 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2024.
All research outputs
#454,210
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Research
#6
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,280
of 173,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Research
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.