The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 369 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 KP.3, LB.1, and KP.2.3 variants
|
---|---|
Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(24)00415-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yu Kaku, Maximilian Stanley Yo, Jarel Elgin Tolentino, Keiya Uriu, Kaho Okumura, The Genotype to Phenotype Japan Consortium, Jumpei Ito, Kei Sato |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 369 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 341 | 92% |
Scientists | 14 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 371. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2024.
All research outputs
#90,771
of 26,588,548 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#281
of 6,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,191
of 310,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#3
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,548 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.