↓ Skip to main content

Understanding individualised genetic interventions as research-treatment hybrids

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding individualised genetic interventions as research-treatment hybrids
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, June 2024
DOI 10.1136/jme-2023-109729
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josephine Johnston, Kathryn Tabb, Danielle Pacia, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Wendy K Chung, Paul S Appelbaum

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,828,932
of 26,220,821 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1,623
of 3,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,282
of 162,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,220,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.