↓ Skip to main content

Cellularized Biomaterials Used as Gingival Connective Tissue Substitutes In Vivo: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Tissue Engineering, Part B: Reviews, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cellularized Biomaterials Used as Gingival Connective Tissue Substitutes In Vivo: A Systematic Review
Published in
Tissue Engineering, Part B: Reviews, June 2024
DOI 10.1089/ten.teb.2024.0031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camille Déchelette, Rawen Smirani, Chantal Médina, Adrien Naveau

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#6,951,508
of 26,473,472 outputs
Outputs from Tissue Engineering, Part B: Reviews
#112
of 461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,107
of 296,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tissue Engineering, Part B: Reviews
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,473,472 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 461 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them